Children And Television Essay -- essays research papers

Children atomic number 18 vulnerable and easily swayed by everything around them. P bents try to do everything in their power to protect their electric razorren from unhealthy environments. They child-proof everything, but they dont realize that thousands of strangers enter the home everyday...through the television receiver. Television is in 98% of North American homes and the average Canadian child watches four hours of television every day. Most parents do not realize that their children are watching effect-ridden television programs and that by the age of 18 the average North American child will have viewed over 200,000 acts of television violence. Children should not be allowed to watch godforsaken television programs because children are easily desensitized to violence, they are unable to distinguish populace and fantasy and they copy what they see on television. Children are very impressionable and are easily desensitized to the violence they see on television. Researc h has shown that young children are aroused by aggressive scenes on television and show higher levels of emotion when watching aggressive programs than when watching passive programs. The arousal diminishes with repeated photograph to television and the violence no longer affects children. When people are no longer aroused by violence they become less responsive to valet suffering and may not be as quick to help or may not intervene during an emergency. When there is a problem, arousal levels are high and quick action is taken but when arousal levels do no increase then people are not as touch about the problem and may not jump in to solve it. Because society is becoming more aggressive, there will be more violent sociatal situations and if people do not take swift action and help because they are desenstiaed to the violence, many lives could be lost. Young children have trouble distinguishing between realism and fantasy. They cannot make objective evaluations, cannot form logic al conclusions and cannot sort out relevant data about the things they see on television. They dont understand the difference of opinion between what is possible and what is actually probable. If a young child see individual on TV jumping off a mountain and arrive on their feet, they believe that it is real becausw they saw it happen with their own eyes and do not have the capacity to believe otherwise. Children do not work up the capacity to dis... ...eir children are watching in addition to the type of programs. In the formative years, they should also let off to their children the difference between " accept" and "reality." For example, if the child sees someone getting shot on a TV program, the parent should point out that these are just actors pretending to get shot with a pretend gun. Frank discussions about the repercussions of real violence should also be discussed, with the focus on "right" and "wrong" behavior. This will help develop a grit of morality within the child which will allow him or her to make more informed decisions. The hue and cry about reducing the amount of violence on TV has had little affect on programmers or producers. The best defense parents can mount against the cumulative affects of television violence is to clearly explain to their children what is acceptable behavior. If parents explain their expectations to their children, they will be better able to formulate their own opinion regarding violence within a strong moral fashion model rather than within a blurred and confused sense of television reality which glorifies violence and makes is seen acceptable.